data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2141d/2141dbf699b51f4b33e808327d61f60a83407949" alt=""
Back in the 70’s Labour Chancellor Dennis Healy talked about ‘squeezing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92820/92820382dc6ccffcbbb38ec630ecd535b14c13d6" alt=""
Alistair Darling’s no socialist either. Actually fuck knows what he is – at least Healy was an honest social democrat (sort of). But Darling's pre budget report seems to have pissed off a lot of the right people. All it took was a teeny-weeny attempt to tinker with a regressive tax (VAT) and to introduce a teeny-weeny bit of progressive taxation in the form of a higher income tax band for high earners.
Polly Toynbee sees in this a radical departure and an abandonment of the New Labour project in favour of good old-fashioned social-democracy. It's no such thing, it's a half-hearted Keynesian measure to stimulate retail spending. Measures that would actually make a difference to people’s lives – like a cap on fuel bills are conspicuous by their absence.
But what’s significant is not what comes from New Labour but from the Tories.
Cameron’s compassionate conservatism and eco-populism is not worth a toss. Faced with the most nonthreatening of measures, their reflex reaction is to defend the interests of the wealthy and begrudge any meagre concessions to the working class.
Same old Tories. Same old (New) Labour.
1 comment:
i think you've summed up what the pre-budget report means quite well
Post a Comment